if one drank from a glass of water or blotted lightly, the color that remained was more like the initial layer of product. I found that once some of the shine wore down, e.g. The coverage ranged from semi-sheer to medium, and most shades were buildable to semi-opaque coverage, though they tended to wear down to more medium coverage within an hour or so of wear. That being said, the current range is heavier on mid-tones, and it is often very light shades that can be the culprits of both. Most of the shades applied evenly, didn't seem to catch or emphasize texture imperfections on my lips, and weren't prone to settling into my lip lines. The colors that were brought back in the new formula were fairly consistent with the prior versions. It is still a lighter-weight, thinner consistency relative to MAC's other lipsticks and most other lipstick formulas on the market. The updated take on the Lustre finish is more emollient, creamier, and has more consistent coverage. The wear ranged from three to four hours, which was in line with other, more luminous formulas of similar coverage-level and was a little longer than the average Lustre lipstick in the past (though more consistent with recently released Lustres). It likely comes as no shock that they did not wear close to eight hours. Eight hours of wear is a feat for any lipstick, let alone one that is sheerer, more luminous, and hydrating.

The formula is supposed to have 'sheer, buildable colour' that is moisturizing, while also being long-wearing with 'six hours' of shine and 'eight hours' of color.įirst and foremost, these have an unexpectedly long long-wearing claim.

Mac lipstick cool undertones